Ripple (XRP) seems to be embroiled in a lawsuit again. This time it’s a proposed class of California purchasers who have filed the lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc. The California Class Action suit against Ripple claims that their digital tokens, XRP are securities. The cryptocurrency company’s subsidiary XRP II LLC and Bradley Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple are also named in the lawsuit as defendants. Ripple has been embroiled in another lawsuit just last month. The plaintiff, an investor called Ryan Coffey claimed that the company sold XRP tokens in an unregistered sale.
The class action suit claims that the organization “conflated the value of XRP with its other software efforts.” It claims that this move was deliberate on behalf of the company to boost the tokens’ value. Lawyers filed this class action on Tuesday at Robbins Arroyo and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in San Mateo Superior Court. The securities defence bar considers the venue to be a plaintiff-friendly one. This new California class action suit against XRP’s company seeks to verify a class of all California XRP buyers.
The company’s lawyers removed the lawsuit filed against the fintech company previously to the federal court. The lawyers involved were from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Debevoise & Plimpton along with Mary Jo White, the former SEC Chair. Speaking about the new lawsuit against them, a Ripple spokesperson said,
It’s “just another example of an extortionist bringing forth an opportunistic suit that lacks merit.”
She further added,
“We feel confident that the claims regarding XRP are completely unfounded both in law and fact.”
The new lawsuit against Ripple
The class action claims that the founders of Ripple kept 20 billion of the 100 billion total XRP. XRP’s has a current market capitalization of $24 billion. According to the case, Ripple retained the remaining 80 billion and can sell around 1 billion XRP per month. The complaint called this a “never ending ICO.” It also states that XRP’s sale also “dwarfs any other source of revenue” at the Blockchain-based start-up.
The suit also claimed that nearly $92 million worth of XRP was sold by the defendants in just the 1st quarter of 2017. According to the argument by the legal people at Robbins Arroyo and Robbins Geller, XRP must be registered as a security under California law. This is because the sale of the tokens are used to fund Ripple’s business undertakings. They further argue that the success of the company or its tokens cannot be controlled by the buyers of XRP.
The amount that the suit seeks in damages hasn’t been disclosed. And, additionally it also wants to be able to undo prior XRP purchases. The lawyers also wrote:
“If defendants fail to create an adequate market for XRP, inadequately or incorrectly manage the XRP Ledger, or there is a loss of confidence in Ripple’s management by the general market, plaintiff and the class members’ investment in XRP will likely lose money.”
Ripple CEO’s Tweet
The suit alleges that Garlinghouse and Ripple, have led to confusion in the market by linking the company’s software efforts with XRP. These software efforts were intended to enable international transfers between banks. The complaint especially points out a Twitter post by Garlinghouse. The post in question was in response to several skeptical quotes posted by a New York Times reporter. The reporter had posted quotes he’d heard from bankers questioning if Ripple’s financial customers would actually buy XRP.
Over the last few months I’ve spoken with ACTUAL banks and payment providers. They are indeed planning to use xRapid (our XRP liquidity product) in a serious way. This is a sampling of what I heard: pic.twitter.com/y3TN8YRC34
— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) January 5, 2018
The lawsuit against Ripple alleges that this tweet helps establish that the defendants
“acted on behalf of the common enterprise, with the expectation of increase (sic) the value of XRP, and thus causing a profit.”
Image via NewsBTC
Join our telegram group.